单选题In the world today any damage to society, whether at the local or at the global level, will not remain unnoticed.A 在当今世界，社会受到局部或全面损坏的程度还是难以确定的。B 在当今世界，对社会所造成的任何局部或整体损害都依然未被察觉。C 在当今世界，对社会的任何损坏，无论是局部的还是全球性的，终究会被察觉出来。

题目

单选题

In the world today any damage to society, whether at the local or at the global level, will not remain unnoticed.

在当今世界，社会受到局部或全面损坏的程度还是难以确定的。

在当今世界，对社会所造成的任何局部或整体损害都依然未被察觉。

在当今世界，对社会的任何损坏，无论是局部的还是全球性的，终究会被察觉出来。

更多“In the world today any damage to society, whether at the loc”相关问题

第1题

________ any case or suspected case of quarantinable disease， or any case of eruptive disease or any death be discovered， the local quarantine officer must be notified immediately．A.IfB.ShallC.ShouldD.Whether

点击查看答案
第2题

If while the ship is in port damage is verified after survey，the master should submit a note of extended protest to ________ as that to which the initial protest was submitted.A.another partyB.any authoritiesC.the same partyD.any party concerned

点击查看答案
第3题

The invariable result of ______ average is that the loss falls on the owner of the particular property which has suffered the damage，whether that damage was due to deliberate sacrifice or to an accident．A.specialB.particularC.generalD.total

点击查看答案
第4题

The defences and limits of liability ______ in this bill of lading shall apply in any action against the carrier for loss of or damage to the goods whether the action be founded in contract or in tort.A.requiredB.provided forC.requestedD.supplied

点击查看答案
第5题

材料:Some older decisions have held that the carrier，in order to rebut the presumption of liability resulting from the arrival in damaged condition of GOODs shipped undamaged，must prove not only that the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the carrier&39;s part．Most more recent decisions and authors，however，uphold the view that，in general，the carrier may rebut the claimant&39;s prima facie case simply by proving that the loss was caused by an excepted peril．At that point，the onus switches to the cargo claimant to prove that the true cause of the loss was the carrier&39;s negligence．Nevertheless certain Hague and Hague/Visby Rules exceptions，expressly or implicitly，also require the carrier to negative its own negligence in proving the exception itself．For example，a clause in the said rules expressly imposes on the carrier the burden of proving that the loss or damage occurred without its actual fault or privity and without any fault or neglect on the part of its servants or agents．The carrier，however，must truly prove the existence of one or more of the exceptions and their causative role in respect of the loss or damage．Conjectures and speculation do not take the place of hard evidence．A court has held：“Mere speculation will not overcome the prima facie evidence of a clean bill of lading”．问题：The carrier will be held liable for the loss or damage if _______．A.it is proved that he has privity to the loss or damageB.it is proved that the fault or neglect on his part is not the true cause of the loss or damageC.it is too onerous for him to demonstrate that the loss or damage is caused by what is beyond his controlD.if there are conjectures and speculationIn accordance with old decisions，the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______．A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his partB.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perilsC.the harm did not result from any negligence on his partD.there are conjectures and speculationIn accordance with most more recent decisions and authors，the carrier will not be excused unless he has proved that _______．A.not only the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perils，but also that the harm did not result from any negligence on the his partB.the loss or damage was caused by one of the excepted perilsC.the harm did not result from any negligence on his partD.there are conjectures and speculationIt is concluded that _______．A.The carrier is not in a position to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perilsB.It can not be decided that whether the carrier has to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils because there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby RulesC.The carrier does not have to prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils due to the fact that there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby RulesD.The carrier must truly prove the loss or damage is substantially caused by one or more of the excepted perils even there are some differences between the decisions and authors and requirements of Hague and Hague/Visby Rules请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析，谢谢！

点击查看答案
第6题

Critics argue that the best way to protect our environment is not to do any damage to it.A.Right B.Wrong C.Not mentioned

点击查看答案
第7题

单选题What is considered a Serious Marine Incident? （）A an allision that results in $500 damage to a boat dockB an injury to a crewmember，passenger，or other person which requires professional medical treatment beyond first aidC grounding of a vessel on a sandbar that does not result in injuries and/or any damage to the vesselD None of the above

点击查看答案

高等学校英语应用能力

题目

更多“In the world today any damage to society, whether at the loc”相关问题

第1题

第2题

第3题

第4题

第5题

第6题

第7题

相关内容